SoundCloud Pro Fan-Powered Royalties: Why They Pay Artists More Fairly Than Spotify

Published on Nov 7, 2025

Free

SoundCloud Pro Fan-Powered Royalties: Why They Pay Artists More Fairly Than Spotify

Most streaming platforms pool their revenue and divide it by total plays. That system rewards whoever gets the most streams, not necessarily who has the most dedicated listeners.

SoundCloud’s Fan-Powered Royalties (FPR) flips that logic. It ties every dollar back to individual user behavior, letting smaller artists earn real money from loyal fans instead of competing against superstars for fractions of pennies.

[ Download the full PDF guide ] or [ Access full Online Version ]

Claim One Month Free of SoundCloud Pro


How Fan-Powered Royalties Work

SoundCloud separates two types of revenue:

1. Major Label & Distributor Streams – Paid through traditional, platform-wide splits.

2. Pro Artist Streams – Paid through fan-powered accounting.

If you’re a Pro artist, every listener’s subscription or ad revenue is divided only among the artists that the listener actually streamed.

Example:

If I pay $10 a month for SoundCloud Go and play 100 songs—50 of which are yours—you earn 50 percent of my contribution, or $5.

If I’m on the free plan and my activity generated $2 in ad revenue, you’d get $1 of that.

You’re no longer fighting for a share of some giant global pot. You’re paid according to your personal connection with each fan.


Why It Matters

In a typical pro-rata system, every stream competes with every other stream on the platform. One viral hit can drag down the value of everyone else’s plays.

Under SoundCloud’s model, one listener streaming you ten times this week is more valuable than ten strangers hearing you once.

It rewards fan intensity, not total volume.


The Math in Practice

Let’s say Spotify generated $1,000 this month. You earned 100 streams, and another artist earned 1 million. Your 100 plays equal 0.01 percent of all streams. You’d take home $0.10.

On SoundCloud, if I’m one of your fans and half my listening time is spent on your music, you’d get half of what I paid the platform, regardless of how many times Drake or Taylor Swift were streamed overall. If I’m paying $10 for go and I streamed two songs, one of which was yours, you earn $5 for 1 stream.

Your listeners’ loyalty directly shapes your payout.

The O.P.P. Problem

Spotify’s structure creates what I call an O.P.P. economy—Other People’s Profit.

Your fans’ subscription fees and ad views contribute to a global pool that primarily rewards whoever already dominates the charts. Even if your supporters listen daily, most of their money goes elsewhere.

SoundCloud removes that siphon. Your fans fund you.


The Catch

Fan-Powered Royalties rely on direct fan engagement. If most of your streams come from algorithmic or editorial playlists, you won’t earn much. Passive discovery doesn’t translate into payouts unless those listeners stick around.

This model rewards real communities - artists with audiences that choose them intentionally.


Comparing the Two Models

System

Basis of Payment

Who Benefits

Downside

Spotify (Pro-Rata)

Platform-wide popularity

Major artists & playlist acts

Dilutes fan value

SoundCloud (Fan-Powered)

Individual fan activity

Independent artists with loyal listeners

Requires true engagement


Long-Term Impact

Fan-Powered Royalties make SoundCloud the only major platform where cultivating a small, loyal fanbase can outperform chasing playlists.

A few hundred fans who stream you repeatedly can generate more income than thousands of passive Spotify plays.

For independent artists, that’s a fundamental shift - from popularity-driven income to relationship-driven income.


Conclusion

SoundCloud’s Fan-Powered Royalties reward what actually matters: genuine listening.

If your goal is to build a community instead of chasing algorithms, it’s one of the fairest streaming systems available.

Next in the SoundCloud Pro Guide: [ SoundCloud Pro Distribution → ]

Rating

We measure service quality on a scale of 0 - 5 feature by feature. The lower the score, the worse the service quality. The higher the score, the better the service quality.

Table of Contents